No one would be surprised to hear that standover tactics, bullying and violence are rife in prison. But you may be surprised to learn that prison nurses in New Zealand also engage in this kind of behaviour. In 2006, management at Corrections were so concerned about bullying by prison nurses, they asked the Health & Disability Commission to investigate.
The HDC dispatched two employees, Dr Elizabeth Finn and Mr David Webber to conduct a series of workshops in prison health centres. The first was held at the Waikeria prison in 2006 and workshops were subsequently held in another 12 prisons.
In 2008, a damning summary of the HDC’s findings was released in a report titled "Team development workshops for prisons nursing services delivered by Dr Elizabeth Finn and Mr David Webber". In September 2009, a copy of the report was sent to the Ombudsman by HDC chief legal advisor, Nicola Sladden, describing a “culture of horizontal violence and bullying” within prison health centres. It identified the following problems:
Lack of leadership
Discouraged medication policy
Another failing identified by Finn and Webber concerned the prescribing of medication by prison doctors. The authors wrote:
“It appears that some doctors are not sufficiently aware of the context of the prison environment and the particular challenges it presents. For example, some medications are inappropriate in this environment because of their potential for use as ‘currency’. Lack of national consistency with respect to provision of medications to patients who are prisoners may lead to stand-over tactics and abuse directed towards doctors in the first instance, and also towards nurses. A robust induction programme for doctors would be helpful.”
From time to time, prisoners have to be taken to hospital with serious injuries or medical problems. Finn and Webber even reprimand doctors in Emergency Departments – apparently for not doing what they are told by prison nurses. The report says:
“(Doctors in) EDs may not be cooperating with advice from nurses that certain medications are not allowable in prisons, and may still be prescribing these (codeine, morphine).”
For severe pain, opiates like codeine and morphine are the medications of choice. But the HDC seems to believe that prisoners should not have their pain relieved, even in emergency situations. Apparently, they should continue to suffer - even when the pain is so bad they need to be taken to hospital.
This ‘discouraged medication policy’ extends well beyond opiate pain relief. All medications including antidepressants and antipsychotic drugs are taken away from prisoners - usually on their first day in prison. Although this practice varies from one prison to another, often such medications are never reinstated.
Breach of medical ethics and human rights
Denying patients clinically appropriate medication, especially when they are in severe pain or have mental health disorders, is inhumane and a breach of human rights. It contributes to depression and even to suicide. The policy also encourages prison doctors to breach their medical ethics which require them to “Consider the health and well-being of the patient to be your first priority”; and to “render medical service to that person without discrimination." When doctors are coerced into making prison policy their first priority, and discriminate against the patient because he or she is in prison, they risk being struck off for breaching their ethics.
The systematic denial of opiates and other clinically appropriate medication is a form of pharmacological or 'clean' torture; it causes serious harm and distress to the prisoner without leaving any visible evidence. But the Health and Disability Commission seems to condone this practice.
For an agency responsible for promoting safe medical practices, this is truly disturbing. It suggests the HDC is complicit in Corrections strategy to breach the human rights of prisoners and raises serious questions about the integrity of investigations into complaints by prisoners who need these medications.
The Commissioner's response
In July this year, I wrote to the HDC and asked if they still endorse this ‘discouraged medication policy’. Mr Anthony Hill, the Commissioner, replied:
“It is not HDC’s practice to endorse the policies or procedures of health care providers. This is because I must consider complaints to HDC fairly, with an open mind and free from bias. This may be called into question if I have previously endorsed a policy or procedure that is the subject of a complaint to HDC.”
That’s the whole point. The Finn Webber report is quite clearly an endorsement of Corrections discouraged medication policy and my letter therefore questions the integrity of all HDC investigations into prisoner healthcare in the last five years. Since Mr Hill refused to acknowledge the bias in the HDC’s position, I have now written to the Ombudsman suggesting that if the HDC does not endorse this particular policy, then the Ombudsman should encourage the Commissioner to write to Corrections and tell them so. Otherwise, the Finn Webber report gives the Department every reason to continue removing clinically appropriate medication from prisoners, leaving them in pain and distress - and believing the HDC endorses this unethical practice.
I also suggested to the Ombudsman that he/she should persuade the Corrections Department to change this practice and remove it from their Medicines Policy. This is because New Zealand is party to the Convention against Torture and Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment which requires Governments to take effective measures to prevent the torture and ill treatment of people who are detained by the State. And since 2007, when New Zealand signed the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture (OPCAT), the Ombudsman became one of the monitoring bodies with responsibility to ensure that New Zealand meets its obligations under the Convention. If he does not intervene, then by failing to act, the Ombudsman is also condoning and endorsing the torture and ill treatment of New Zealand prisoners.