Latest poll supports Waitakere City submissions
A just-released survey of its residents supports Waitakere City Council’s submission to the select committee looking at governance changes in Auckland.
The Council will appear in front of the select committee this week. Today it released a telephone poll of 400 people aged 18 and over.
The results show a massive 86 percent of Waitakere residents want the proposed ‘local boards’, which will replace the region’s councils, to be able to make key decisions and receive funding to implement them.
The bill which is being deliberated on by the select committee currently restricts the powers and functions of the local boards.
“The fact is that 20 to 30 powerless little boards won’t work, will be expensive to run and will not deliver democracy or better services than the model we have proposed,” says Deputy Mayor Penny Hulse.
“They need real grunt to continue the good community work of the current local councils.”
"We can only hope that the select committee listens to the logic of the arguments we are putting forward and takes account of the huge weight of public opinion,” she says.
Waitakere’s submission also urges that all Auckland Council members should be elected from wards and there should be no 'at large' representation other than the Mayor. Respondents in the survey agree, with 78 percent wanting the ward-based system introduced.
On the issue of Maori seats on the new Auckland Council there was almost an even split: 42 percent support the idea with 44 percent opposed. A further 14 percent had no opinion.
The poll was conducted by Phoenix Research.
Ends
For further information: Penny Hulse (021 273 4663)
Editor’s note
Main points of Waitakere’s submission:
- All Auckland Council members should be elected from wards (there should be no 'at large' representation other than the Mayor)
- There should be six wards for the election of 20 councillors, with each ward electing a number of councillors that is proportional to the population within the ward
- The mayor, and all Auckland Council and local board members, should be elected for a four-year term using the STV voting system
- Maori representation on the Auckland Council and throughout local government in New Zealand is supported, with the method and level to be determined by the Government
- Local boards should be renamed ‘Community Councils’ and be empowered to make decisions on local issues
- The legislation should ensure that sufficient funding and resources are provided to the Community Councils (local boards) by the Auckland Council
- The number of Community Councils should be between 12 and 20.
Waitakere City Council Survey III on Auckland Governance
July 2009
Topline results
A telephone survey of a random sample of 400 Waitakere City residents aged 18 and over, conducted between 4 and 6 July 2009.
Technical note: Data are weighted by sex and age to ensure even representation of these groups.
Q1) As you may have heard, in October next year, the government will combine the seven current city and district councils in the Auckland region, and the regional council, in to one new Auckland Council, or ‘Super City’. From what you have read, seen or heard, how in favour or opposed are you to the formation of the one Auckland Council?
Count | Column N % | ||
Attitude to Super City | Strongly in favour | 36 | 9.0% |
In favour | 101 | 25.3% | |
Opposed | 113 | 28.3% | |
Strongly opposed | 78 | 19.4% | |
No opinion | 72 | 18.0% | |
Total | 400 | 100.0% | |
Attitude to Super City | Strongly in favour/ In favour | 137 | 34.3% |
Strongly opposed/ opposed | 191 | 47.7% | |
No opinion | 72 | 18.0% |
Previous Results (April 2009)
IN FAVOUR OF GOVERNMENT DECISION FOR NEW AUCKLAND COUNCIL |
|
Total Waitakere |
|
Number of respondents | 401 |
In favour | 34% |
Not in favour | 47% |
No opinion | 15% |
Not sure/don't know | 4% |
TOTAL | 100% |
Q2) Various views have been expressed by people regarding the Auckland Super City. As I read out the following statements, please tell me if you strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree, or have no opinion.
Count | Column N % | ||
The new Auckland Council should focus on making decisions that affect the whole region. | Strongly agree | 135 | 33.7% |
Agree | 160 | 40.1% | |
Disagree | 40 | 10.0% | |
Strongly disagree | 25 | 6.2% | |
No opinion | 41 | 10.1% | |
Total | 400 | 100.0% | |
Focus on regional decisions | Agree/ Strongly Agree | 295 | 73.7% |
Disagree/ Strongly Disagree | 65 | 16.1% | |
No opinion | 41 | 10.1% |
Count | Column N % | ||
The proposed local boards should be able to make decisions that affect the local area, and receive funding for this. | Strongly agree | 179 | 44.8% |
Agree | 165 | 41.3% | |
Disagree | 24 | 5.9% | |
Strongly disagree | 9 | 2.4% | |
No opinion | 23 | 5.7% | |
Total | 400 | 100.0% | |
Local boards for local decision | Agree/ Strongly Agree | 344 | 86.0% |
Disagree/ Strongly Disagree | 33 | 8.3% | |
No opinion | 23 | 5.7% |
Count | Column N % | ||
All of the councillors on the new Auckland Council should be elected by people in their local area (that is by Ward ) rather than elected by people across the whole region (that is At Large ) | Strongly agree | 177 | 44.3% |
Agree | 134 | 33.5% | |
Disagree | 34 | 8.4% | |
Strongly disagree | 21 | 5.1% | |
No opinion | 34 | 8.6% | |
Total | 400 | 100.0% | |
Ward rather than At Large | Agree/ Strongly Agree | 312 | 77.8% |
Disagree/ Strongly Disagree | 54 | 13.6% | |
No opinion | 34 | 8.6% |
Count | Column N % | ||
There should be Maori seats on the Auckland Council in addition to the 20 councillors already proposed. | Strongly agree | 78 | 19.6% |
Agree | 90 | 22.4% | |
Disagree | 86 | 21.4% | |
Strongly disagree | 91 | 22.6% | |
No opinion | 56 | 14.0% | |
Total | 400 | 100.0% | |
Maori Seats | Agree/ Strongly Agree | 168 | 42.0% |
Disagree/ Strongly Disagree | 176 | 44.0% | |
No opinion | 56 | 14.0% |
Sample Description
Raw Number | Unweighted
% |
Weighted
% |
|
Male | 188 | 47.0 | 47.7 |
Female | 212 | 53.0 | 52.3 |
Total | 400 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Raw Number | Unweighted
% |
Weighted
% |
|
18 to 29 years | 57 | 14.3 | 22.3 |
30 to 44 years | 132 | 33.0 | 34.5 |
45 to 59 years | 106 | 26.5 | 25.0 |
60 years or over | 105 | 26.3 | 18.2 |
Total | 400 | 100.0 | 100.0 |